alert日志应该所有的dba都很熟悉了,不过有多少人见过alert日志中报这个玩意的吗?
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0×1e4ec.2.10], SCN: 0×0795.503eefc3
Tue Mar 11 01:28:29 2008
WARNING! CONTROLFILE SEQUENCE NUMBER TOO OLD, RE-READING…
WARNING! CONTROLFILE SEQUENCE NUMBER TOO OLD, RE-READING…
WARNING! CONTROLFILE SEQUENCE NUMBER TOO OLD, RE-READING…
********************* ATTENTION: ********************
The controlfile header block returned by the OS
has a sequence number that is too old.
The controlfile might be corrupted.
PLEASE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO START UP THE INSTANCE
without following the steps below.
RE-STARTING THE INSTANCE CAN CAUSE SERIOUS DAMAGE
TO THE DATABASE, if the controlfile is truly corrupted.
In order to re-start the instance safely,
please do the following:
(1) Save all copies of the controlfile for later
analysis and contact your OS vendor and Oracle support.
(2) Mount the instance and issue:
ALTER DATABASE BACKUP CONTROLFILE TO TRACE;
(3) Unmount the instance.
(4) Use the script in the trace file to
RE-CREATE THE CONTROLFILE and open the database.
*****************************************************
Instance terminated by ARC0, pid = 20705
反正是我第一次见到alert中报这个的,oracle还是很友好的,在alert中已经明确的告诉我们该怎么处理这种情况.
6 Comments to “alter日志见过,见过alert日志报下面的信息的吗?”
Write a comment
You need tologin.

10g or 11g?
不好意思是9i,哈哈 ,看来见过这个的人还真的不多,呵呵
明显是百年一遇,出现的概率和艳照门差不多的!
很荣幸啊,我是本次奇遇的第一发现人,哈哈哈哈,当时第一反应就是,TMD,这下搞大了
明显是百年一遇,出现的概率和艳照门差不多的!这句话经典,哈哈
呵呵,原来三少也遇到了这个报错。。。。_顺便问一下,你是在什么情况下遇到的?